One Hour One Life Forums

I was excited about this, but now the cities are full of dead dogs and that's kind of a bummer XD Seriously though, thank you for fixing this!

Do the bodies of our four-legged companions disappear over time? If not, could you add that in your next update?

Dickson Muncher

I like it. I've used my curse token by accident so many times, it's getting annoying. +1

I like that people can grief because it adds some danger to the game aside from accidentally stepping on a snake that's hidden behind a tree.

If we were to ban griefers, which I don't think is a good idea, the only conflict in OHOL would be player versus environment which, although a big part of the game, can be pretty one dimensional.

With the addition of a griefer we suddenly have a game where the player is pitted against other players AND the environment. A lot of games do this.

However, griefers add a third aspect of conflict-- internal conflict. Having to decide whether or not to kill someone for their crimes, or whether or not to let a cursed baby live 'just in case they redeem themselves', gives us a little extra conflict to spice up our games.

Not to mention the thrill of the chase and the satisfaction of revenge!

All in all, I think Jason is right in not doing too much more to get rid of griefers-- he has the right idea, and I adore the mechanic that makes the players responsible for making their own societal rules and enforcing them. It's part of the legacy you pass on, as much as farm or a building is. Each village is different in how it deals with griefers, and it's that diversity of culture (and not the day-to-day grind of farming) that really makes this game unique. He shouldn't have to change the way the game works in such an immense way JUST because some people are sore losers.

I'm not saying I've never been SUPER pissed off at times because someone was griefing up a storm in a village I worked hard to help build, but that's just part of the game. This is the first online mulitplayer game I've EVER played, and I understand now why people are so nervous about Fallout76 coming out LOL

Anyways, my suggestion is for villagers to talk more to each other. Maybe develop factions, or class systems even? Like, anyone wearing a rabbit hat is X and anyone wearing a wool hat is Y and no hat is Z, that kind of thing.

I would like for there to be more diverse weapons. Maybe even a lance that can be wielded on horseback or used to kill a horse that someone is riding? Also, this could turn into jousting tournaments, and I think we can all agree how cool that would be.

Yeah I know I was there. If I remember correctly, someone told me that the village was full of griefers. Then there were suddenly a bunch of complete walnuts standing around doing "-----" etc., and they died, and suddenly no more griefers. Weird....

That road is the worst.

Bump this thread so much +10000000000000

I am genuinely confused here-- just to be clear, I'm talking ONLY about the game now. I'm going to just ignore any references to mental health from now on because you are hopelessly conceited about your "pseudo psychology" "skills" and, one last time, are heinously uneducated and unqualified to be doling out diagnoses and/or advice.

So the overarching question in this entire shit-show is whether or not it is okay to kill another player, and what constitutes griefing.

Hihibanana, you say:

-killing is wrong in the game under any circumstances even if it is used to exact punishment on someone who has already ruined the civilization.

- random murdering is a playstyle and should not be punished because it ruins THAT individual person's game experience

-that conflicts can be resolved or avoided through
      *giving very specific verbal instructions because people don't know what they are doing and need their hands held in the game
     
      *leaving jobs half-completed so people "get the hint" and take initiative to do those jobs, which they wouldn't have done had
       you not, say, left the fire branch beside the kiln

For leaving the job half completed-- if I see a job in progress I'm not going to just take over, because someone is clearly in the middle of doing something. I'm just going to walk away and let it be. If you're the kind of person that just picks up a smithing hammer and starts hammering someone else's iron bar then I have probably bitched about you and may have considered doing you a murder (figurative 'you' not YOU personally). It's incredibly rude to go and take something when someone is in the middle of something. I've done it by accident before, but the person will usually chase me down and I apologize and give the item back because I get it, it's frustrating.

Another thing, if you've started a job then you should finish that job, don't rely on other people to do it for you because that's just lazy.

As for killing griefers, I think what constitutes a griefer has been well established in these forums AND I have given many examples which I wont repeat. If griefers are roleplayers, then people who kill griefers are also roleplayers because they are PLAYING the ROLE of justice keepers or protectors. They are still interacting with the game. So why does one group of roleplayer get preference over another?

Hihibanna, you have been consistently off topic AND you have been trying to bring people down, so I don't know where you get off reporting Pharo lol If anything WE should be reporting you for outright telling people they're having mental breakdowns, are psychotic, or narcissistic. Just because people don't agree with you, doesn't mean something is wrong with them. You posted this, it was open for comments, you claim you only want a debate and you talk about "truths"--- well let me learn you something about truth: in order to find truth you have to follow the evidence to where it takes you no matter whether you like the results or not. Most of us have arrived already and we're just waiting on you, friend.

You. Are. Not. A. Psychologist.
Please please PLEASE in all seriousness STOP with the mental illness comments. It is offensive, it is inappropriate, and what you are saying is DANGEROUS. I don't know what's worse: if you realize exactly how harmful your comments can be to someone and don't care, or you are so misinformed that you actually think you are helping.

Cursed babies have been cursed by TEN DIFFERENT PEOPLE which means that ten different people thought that the person had done something that deserved cursing RECENTLY.

I don't understand why people keep cursed babies either. It's insane. I always test the babies I have and let them die if they are cursed.

Uncle Gus is right, that is too many words. In this game you have to be quick. A minute = 1 year in this game, remember, so if saying something takes less than a minute it really takes most of a year in game.

Although it would be nice if people would put aside desires to go do their own thing for just a little while if their civilization needs them to stay, it wont always happen. I personally don't kill people for that but I understand why Pein did. I haven't always wanted to water berry bushes, and I certainly dont like having to scavenge for milkweed threads and ropes to make bows and arrows to kill bears with, but I do it because I know it is crucial that it gets done. When the crisis is over, then I can go back to what I'm doing.

Of course, if people pitched in to keep the farms running instead of sponging that would eliminate the need for someone to sacrifice their desires to save a civilization.

Edit: used wrong word lol sentence didn't make sense.