One Hour One Life Forums

No, it's a problem with EVERY character model, much before this, I just never put it because I figured it was in known bugs. . .

STOP THE GINGERS!!!  Spread the word that they have NO souls, and for every freckle they have is a soul they have STOLEN in a past life, and worst of all, when they die the become VAMPIRES in their next life. 

WE MUST KILL ALL GINGERS, OR WHEN THE SUPERNATRUAL PATCH COMES, THE WORLD WILL BE DROWNED IN VAMPIRES, AND EVIL SPIRITS WILL RULE!

(Yes, I was the one who started the whole "Gingers have no soul" thing:)

Are you sure about that with Gingers moving a skin color up?  Since Gingers can't move a skin color up, does that mean that they have half the chance to mutate?  This is just a possible issue and not at all confirmed, but Jason aught to look into that, JIC.   

(Honestly, sometimes I wonder if Jason tests his own updates:)

Pein, about your metaphor where having more hoes prevents you from making Adzes, this is different as it does not cost extra to take care of a female over a male, and as I said before, you don't have to take care of children, it is an option, but one men don't have.  Sure, it might be annoying if as the only girl you have a child on an expedition, but ALWAYS better than having no woman in the bloodline, and no children.             
 
And in a situation where you do have a lot of people in the village and have a baby on an expedition, you can just ignore it, which in EVERY case is better than not having the option.  The only valid point I saw was about Forging, and the pros are WAY bigger in order to outweigh something that situational.

What you guys don't get is, girls ARE better than boys, in almost every situation.  Just because you spawn in as a girl does not mean you have to take care of your babies, and choosing a boy over a girl is like refusing an Axe because it has the ability to chop down maple trees:  Sure, it can be used for bad, but most of the time it will turn out useful.  The only time being a female could ever backfire is if you're a noob, and if so you will probably learn pretty quickly.

Yeah, after thinking about SuperFun's post, at least at the time of writing it, she had not actually formulated a bot, as. . .

1:  It is highly unlikely she could design a bot within this amount of time, and also unlikely she would admit to defeat

2:  If she had to make a bot for school, lets be honest. . . she is not showing this game to her teacher

3:  Unlike last time, despite this claim being even LESS believable, this time she decides NOT to post evidence, despite the fact we know that she can

Regardless, she will probably respond with some sort of counter, and if she does, ignore it.  Although I have no been doing this in the past, it is time we do.

I just wish it was the other way around, because this can get pretty bad if people start exploiting this "feature"

THERE HERE?!?

I wish I could say that, I have played for a good while, but still die stupid deaths to forgetting about food.

Yeah, not sure if I want to jynx this but. . . I'm pretty sure you just can't accept defeat:(

Even if not, it will slow down you're bots progress as it does not have the rationality to predict foods locations, and use sharp stones.  so it will only live to 10 minuites a small fraction of the time.

No, I mean the village would never die out, not the pro