One Hour One Life Forums

adding currency without allowing the game to actually develop trade by itself is a horrible idea. Do you know what people will do with vending machines? block them. And good luck unblocking YOUR vennding machine with a town's pick

trade precedes money, and all money is worthless in a system that can easily produce it

Jason has stuck in his head that him gathering berries from his neighbor is a simple barter and that we'll see it in game. What he and people here don't realize is that business model is hardly viable without banks, without him being paid by credit card when people buy games. Sure we don't need people starving all time for them to buy food in game but trading strawberries is hardly the survival based trade that's lacking in this game. Even items like iron ores with 0 direct survival value can be traded as long as we have a currency tied to survivability. Honestly we even have that, food itself. Problems are you have nothing to buy once you're rich with food and everyone has it as well. Honestly, if game designer vs berry farmer is so viable why don't people trade card decks for berries in game?

Do we want trade to matter? make people compete for food and goods.

I think you are confusing tool functions, hoes and skewers do the same thing, turn soil piles in shallow rows and shallow rows and double soil piles in tilled rows.

When a crop like beans and corn leaves shallow rows you need to soil it first and then till with either item.

I wouldnt be surprised if people thought you were trying to make a bow and arrow, which takes skewers

Jason not hiring a bugfix guy so he has more time for progressing content

either this or updates like paper, radios, photographs and fences. While they arent inherently awful (except fence gates) it takes a long time to fix the issues they create and for minimal benefit.

its not a fight when its spoon vs everyone else

I dont try to prevent you from spamming main forum with every idea you have ever so maybe back off or get into the discussion? Im sure calculating resource efficiency is a walk on the park for you.

I wish you'd been as cautious when adding fences, literally everyone here likes the change.

I'm not sure this is a concern, food is plenty to the point its game breaking anyway. I'm up for external kerosene heaters been added but im not really thrilled to see people consuming even less food for little cost.

simple, we stop skipping content and add more means of transportation instead of putting all eves together.

Eves shouldnt be terribly far but not on a short walking distance either

great idea, but you should remove the server +2 bonus

+1 to nails, +1 to more storage options

barrels, wardrobes and dining tables have been largely suggested and are great means of resource contention (since making these is useful but optional).

map is too homogeneous, too few rare resources really matter, all biomes are close.

Making current resources and biomes more interesting in general should spark some measure of exploration.
Gold, copper and lime should get more uses so we actually have the need to gather them.
Wood is also a great candidate for a resource becoming more valuable, because we have ways to grow more if exploring is too hard. Rubber is good because of the need for sulphur.

Of course making biomes larger will make exploring a bigger need but it may also scare some people, so incentives need to be given.

this isnt true, if it was people wouldnt be able to build stuff like temples and shrines for fun only

Building is laborious but not expensive. Logs can be planted and stone has not many other uses. If we had a construction hammer for wall/floor stakes only it would actually help buildings.

yeahh, I may have skipped over that

but tbh 8x8 to 12x12 change is the best thing here.

Jason, can we get a brush to let paint have more uses?