One Hour One Life Forums

Poking caves to summon bears is playing as designed, as if you have a coordinated group of archers you can tile your town with bearskin rugs. I've seen it done before and it's quite neat when accomplished. Now, a baby doing it is not the intended way. Which is what I was alluding to the fact that it's exploiting the system.

Griefing is a legitimately part of the game. Jason had that conversation with other developer friends and in listing all the roles a friended pointed out that the missed job was griefer. Jason's made it clear that he agrees and while we have something like Donkey Town as a deterrent the recent nerf on the punishment of it is indication that Jason knows that it is better to have a revolving door of players who are like this to some extent. Abusing the bear summoning mechanic as a baby is not the intended design but it's one of many tools people can use to grief. Unlike using a knife to kill another player, or hiding tools which is actually a bigger pain for savvy players because the hiding spots are almost limitless, meanwhile - bears can be lured away and are harmless for those who wait it out - actions that won't help at all if another player comes at you with a weapon. Those more destructive griefing methods are locked behind needing to be a certain age.

In essence, this a thousand times.

I understand where you're coming from in wanting this but it's really not going to change any time soon.

If we removed things that helped griefers we wouldn't have much. It's the curse of an online game.

Neato burrito, I like texture options.

When /die was implemented Jason said "we need something that serves as an out for experienced players but isn't something a brand new player uses without understanding why they would want to"

Point being, only after you've experienced lives in various environments should you know running away is  not the only option.

No thanks. I hate almost dying because I picked up my son. It doesn't sound fun dying because you picked up a rock or used a hoe.

Doesn't that make him successful?
You seem to log into the forums just to try and undermine him. Six of your last seven posts are about him after all. You seem...
T R I G G E R E D
Or maybe you're in love?

Extra credit: lock yourself into the fence pen holding the adze after you hid all the mallets.

Damn son that's efficient.

I agree Rebel, and it shouldn't be anything more than those indicators I reckon.

Well...  Sort of. If you had it in the literal center it would quite quickly  become messy.  The other thing is that you would have a lot of people walking through all the time, which is counter intuitive as it's distracting and far from private.

Well what if the top priority scores had a weighted probability within them? That way the shuffling of scores mean that the third highest woman may just have a child instead of the highest priority and you can cry into your cup of tea as it happens.

I figured it would be a feature.

Azrael why you mad though?
It is a tweak not an overhaul... It's the equivalent of being able to make a basket at the foot of some reed stumps.
The idea isn't to guarantee a female child at all - as I said before correctly implemented it wouldn't be uncommon to have five boys no girls.